Stanford v. Roche Questions Bayh-Dole Legislation | GenomeWeb

This article has been updated to correct comments attributed to Justice Ginsburg.

By a GenomeWeb staff reporter

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments this week in a case involving PCR patents between Stanford University and Roche Molecular Systems that could have implications for federally funded research institutions and businesses nationwide.

Get the full story

This story is free
for registered users

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Register now.

Already have an account?
Login Now.

In PNAS this week: carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, selection against educational attainment-linked variants, and more.

Technology Review points out that a new US presidential science advisor hasn't been selected.

Researchers find that blood tests might be able to help determine severity of a concussion, Wired reports.

President-elect Donald Trump considers other candidates for director of the National Institutes of Health, Nature News reports.