Skip to main content
Premium Trial:

Request an Annual Quote

ProteoMonitor/Myriad Proteomics Learns That Databases Do Not a Company Make


By Julia Karow


Myriad Proteomics of Salt Lake City and its new CEO Thomas Ingolia have jumped on the drug discovery bandwagon — and are hanging on tight. Armed with an array of new and established technologies, most notably a target pull-down approach known as chemiproteomics, Myriad has abandoned its quest to map the entire human proteome and now hopes to carve out a niche in the increasingly crowded field of collaborative target validation and discovery.

The company, which began as a joint venture among Myriad Genetics, Hitachi, and Oracle in April 2001, originally set out to create a complete database of protein-protein interactions using its yeast two-hybrid and mass spectrometry-based protein complex analysis technology. It hoped to sell access to the database on a subscription basis.

Two years later, it is clear that this approach doesn’t sell. “If you have all the information, that’s great, but you still need to find compounds that you can work on to develop the drug,” explained Peter Friedli, president of Swiss public investment company New Venturetec, one of Myriad Proteomics’ investors. Ingolia, who joined Myriad in June, says the company is now hoping to add “extra value to [our database] by getting a target identified.”

To do this, the company is employing a dizzying variety of target discovery and validation methods, ranging from the use of protein interaction interference agents such as antibodies, RNAi, and gene deletion to confirm protein interactions found through the yeast or mass spec methods already in place, to focused yeast two-hybrid assays aimed at finding clinically significant binding partners for beta-catenin, a signal transduction protein implicated in prostate cancer.

Myriad Proteomics’ crown jewel of the moment, however, is clearly chemiproteomics. The method, already part of rival Cellzome’s platform since last year and part of MDS Proteomics’ platform as well, uses tethered small molecules to capture protein aggregates. A protein source such as cell culture extract is fed through the pull-down assay and a mass spec then identifies all of the proteins in the resulting bound complexes. Because both novel small molecules and known drugs can be used as the “bait,” new targets can often be found from known leads.

Myriad Proteomics has already begun collaborations with two partners to look at specific disease pathways, although no leads have yet been found. As part of a nearly $500,000 research contract for the Hereditary Disease Foundation, the company is screening libraries for agents that would block protein interactions associated with diseases such as Huntington’s and Alzheimer’s. With Stanley Fields, the inventor of yeast two-hybrid technology, Myriad is trying to identify protein interactions formed due to infection by the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. As for its work on the role of beta-catenin, for which Ingolia says Myriad has already identified “dozens” of proteins involved in binding, there are not yet any takers.

For now, Ingolia insists, no takers is still no problem. He emphasized that Myriad Proteomics still has “well over two years of cash at our current burn,” citing that $30-40 million remains from the initial 2001 investment of $70-80 million, with a burn rate of $1 million per month. Ingolia expects more revenue to come in within six to 12 months — he confirmed that the company is pursuing government grants — and hopes to have financially beneficial partnerships ready in the next 18 months.

Still, becoming profitable will not be easy, says James Featherstone, head of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology consulting at Wood Mackensie in London. “I speak to a number [of companies] every week who are starting out with a fee-for-service model and whose wish it is to use that as a platform to moving into drug discovery,” Featherstone said in an e-mail. “It is early days to say if any of the proteomics companies will make it as drug discovery houses.”

A version of this column appeared in ProteoMonitor’s July 4 edition.


The Scan

Breast Cancer Risk Related to Pathogenic BRCA1 Mutation May Be Modified by Repeats

Several variable number tandem repeats appear to impact breast cancer risk and age at diagnosis in almost 350 individuals carrying a risky Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 founder mutation.

Study Explores Animated Digital Message Approach to Communicate Genetic Test Results to Family Members

In the Journal of Genetic Counseling, the approach showed promise in participants presented with a hypothetical scenario related to a familial hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome diagnosis.

Computational Tool Predicts Mammalian Messenger RNA Degradation Rates

A tool called Saluki, trained with mouse and human messenger RNA data, appears to improve mRNA half-life predictions by taking RNA and genetic features into account, a Genome Biology paper reports.

UK Pilot Study Suggests Digital Pathway May Expand BRCA Testing in Breast Cancer

A randomized pilot study in the Journal of Medical Genetics points to similar outcomes for breast cancer patients receiving germline BRCA testing through fully digital or partially digital testing pathways.