Behavior and Genetic Risk

Premium

As a health psychologist at King's College, London, who studies people's responses to genetic test results, Theresa Marteau says that just informing people about their genetic risk often won't motivate them to change their lifestyle. Genome Technology's Ciara Curtin recently spoke with Marteau about her work. What follows is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for space.

Genome Technology: One of the tenets of personalized medicine is that knowing a person's genetic predispositions will lead to earlier interventions. Do you think that will be the case?

Get the full story with
GenomeWeb Premium

Only $95 for the
first 90 days*

GenomeWeb Premium gives you:
✔ Full site access
✔ Interest-based email alerts
✔ Access to archives

Never miss another important industry story.

Try GenomeWeb Premium now.

Already a GenomeWeb Premium member? Login Now.
Or, See if your institution qualifies for premium access.

*Before your trial expires, we’ll put together a custom quote with your long-term premium options.

Not ready for premium?

Register for Free Content
You can still register for access to our free content.

Congress approved a bill Friday that would increase the US National Institutes of Health's funding by $2 billion for fiscal year 2019.

UK's Labour Party calls for a ban on non-invasive prenatal testing for determining sex, BBC News reports.

Sarah Lawrence College's Laura Hercher warns in a New York Times op-ed that more people are going to need help figuring out what their consumer genetic testing results mean.

In PLOS this week: intra-tumor heterogeneity patterns, genomic analysis of Thoroughbred horse origins, and more.