NY Court Sends CSHL Suit Against One-Time Patent Counsel to Mass.
January 27, 2011
NY Court Sends CSHL Suit Against One-Time Patent Counsel to Mass.
As a result, it will be up to the new court to rule on CSHL's allegations that the law firm Ropes & Gray mishandled certain RNAi-related intellectual property stemming from the work of Greg Hannon and maintained improper business relationships with RNAi drug developers.
Full-text access for premium subscribers only.
Existing premium subscribers login here.
New to GenomeWeb? Register here quickly.
New to GenomeWeb? Register here quickly.
Related Stories
- Law Firm Says New CSHL Claims Against it are Unrelated to Ongoing Suit
December 9, 2010 / Gene Silencing News - CSHL Expands Lawsuit Against IP Counsel to Include Charges of Dealings with Other RNAi Clients
November 11, 2010 / Gene Silencing News - Mass. Court Dismisses CSHL Lawsuit Against Former IP Counsel
March 21, 2013 / Gene Silencing News - Sigma-Aldrich Ordered to Provide Sales Data in CSHL Suit Against Former Patent Counsel
December 13, 2012 / Gene Silencing News - As Sigma-Aldrich Fights Sales Data Subpoena, CSHL Argues that Information Will be Anonymous
December 20, 2012 / Gene Silencing News