In Comments to GINA Rule, GPPC Tries to Clarify Debate Around 'Underwriting' for Wellness Programs
December 09, 2009
In Comments to GINA Rule, GPPC Tries to Clarify Debate Around 'Underwriting' for Wellness Programs
In an attempt to help guide healthcare stakeholders who wish to issue public comments to the interim final GINA rule, Johns Hopkins University's Genetics & Public Policy Center released a model document discussing GINA's underwriting restrictions and how they impact health risk assessments and wellness programs.
Full-text access for premium subscribers only.
Existing premium subscribers login here.
New to GenomeWeb? Register here quickly.
New to GenomeWeb? Register here quickly.
Related Stories
- DMAA Requests Moratorium on GINA's 'Underwriting' Restrictions; Personalized Rx Advocates Object
December 2, 2009 / Pharmacogenomics Reporter - Buying Remaining Stake in Generation Health, CVS Caremark Keeps PGx Programs but Cuts Staff
August 29, 2012 / Pharmacogenomics Reporter - New Firm MetaDiagnostic Moves in to Help Dx Developers, Payors as PBMs Shift from Personalized Rx
August 29, 2012 / Pharmacogenomics Reporter - PMC Urges Stakeholders to Provide Feedback as PCORI Opens Comment Period for Methodology Report
July 25, 2012 / Pharmacogenomics Reporter - Will PCORI's Patient-Centered Comparative Effectiveness Research Track with Personalized Rx?
March 7, 2012 / Pharmacogenomics Reporter