Case Review

The US National Science Foundation is examining suspected cases of plagiarism among its funded grant applications, ScienceInsider reports. An audit by the agency's inspector general office of all 8,000 funded proposals from fiscal year 2011 with plagiarism-detecting software uncovered about 100 instances of suspected plagiarism. "My group is now swamped," James Kroll, the head of administrative investigations in that office, tells ScienceInsider.

Further, Allison Lerner, the NSF inspector general, recently told a congressional panel that the number of allegations of research misconduct has tripled during the last decade, ScienceInsider adds. "The acceptable rate for me should be zero. The IG's results indicate that it's very important to train everybody … so we can bring that rate down," Subra Suresh, the NSF director, says.

Hopeful Sequence

Lilly Grossman had been suffering from painful muscle twitches that would wake her up multiple times a night, preventing both her and her parents from sleeping soundly for the past 13 years, writes Ed Yong at Not Exactly Rocket Science. After participating in Sarah and Eric Topol's Idiopathic Diseases of Man, or IDIOM, study — as part of which Lilly and her parents had both their genomes and exomes sequenced — researchers found mutations in two of Lilly's genes. "The team suspects that ADCY5 accounts for Lilly's shaking, while DOCK3 influences her balance and muscle weakness. It seems that she was born with extraordinary bad luck—a double-whammy of fresh mutations in two separate genes that conspired to produce her unique constellation of problems," Yong writes.

This did, though, suggest a possible treatment, and while that treatment hasn't been a cure, the frequency and severity of Lilly's tremors have lessened, Yong notes. "Treatments aren't going to be instantaneous or 100 percent, but they're hope," Steve Grossman, Lilly's father, tells Yong. "We gained hope. And the more data we have, the better position we'll be in to figure this out."

How to Deal

The Committee on Publication Ethics is holding a virtual forum tomorrow focused on "text recycling," or self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism, or duplication, is a common reason for retractions, adds Ivan Oransky at Retraction Watch. "Such duplication retractions are so common that we don't get to most of them," he notes.

COPE, a group comprised of academic journal editors, says that "opinions are divided as to how much text overlap with an author's own previous publications is acceptable, and editors often find it hard to judge when action is required." It adds that editors from BioMed Central have drawn up some guidelines on the matter to help spark discussion.

While the BioMed Central guidelines note that "editors should consider each case of text recycling on an individual basis," they add that "duplication of data is likely to always be considered serious."

The response to duplicated text, the guidelines add, should vary depending on the severity of the overlap and whether it was detected before or after publication. For example, the guidelines note that if a minor overlap is detected before publication, the authors may merely be asked to re-write that section and cite the paper they drew upon. However, if most of a discussion section is re-used, and it is detected after publication, editors should, according to the guidelines, retract the article.

This Week in PLOS

In PLOS One, researchers report on a genetic analysis of a 33,000-year-old dog skull found in a cave in Siberia's Altai Mountains. A team from the US, Russia, Finland, and Spain performed targeted mitochondrial DNA sequencing on jaw bone and tooth samples from the skull, showing that these samples matched one another and clustered genetically with domestic dogs. The aged canine remnants shared fewer genetic similarities with modern-day wolves or with ancient wolves from the Pleistocene period whose remains were recovered from the same cave. "These results suggest a more ancient history of the dog outside of the Middle East or East Asia," authors of the study say, "previously suggested as centers of dog origin."

For more on the study, check out a related story in our sister publication GenomeWeb Daily News.

Complex traits are often a consequence of common variants falling across many genes, according to a PLOS Genetics study. Researchers from Australia and Korea assessed genotyping data for almost 7,200 individuals from Korea, using a combination of genome-wide estimation and partitioning analyses to look at how well sets of common SNPs explained 49 complex traits — from obesity and blood pressure to liver, lung, and kidney functions. For almost all of the traits tested, SNPs spread across the genome seemed to explain a considerable proportion of the trait's heritability, pointing to widespread polygenicity among complex human traits, study authors argued. "Despite examples where a few variants explain a substantial amount of variation," they say, "all these results are consistent with polygenicity being ubiquitous for most complex traits."

A team from Nigeria and Israel cataloged vector-borne pathogens found in Nigerian dogs and three tick species that pester them for a study in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. The researchers used targeted PCR sequencing to track down vector-borne pathogens in blood and tick samples taken from 181 dogs in Nigeria. The analysis uncovered a wide range of pathogens known for infecting either animals or humans, they note, with around 63 percent of the ticks and more than three-quarters of the dogs apparently carrying at least one vector-borne pathogen.

Health Reform Covers Breast Cancer Test

Genetic testing for breast cancer is to be covered as a preventive service under the US Affordable Care Act, reports MyHealthNewsDaily. A clarification from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Treasury says that asymptomatic, high-risk women — typically with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer — will be able to get tested for the breast cancer risk genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 with no co-pay. This rule applies to non-grandfathered insurance plans.

"We view this clarification as a recognition of the critical value of BRACAnalysis as a preventive service in women's health," Pete Meldrum, the president and CEO of Myriad, says in a statement. "This designation goes a long way in ensuring that high-risk women can now have access to the life-saving preventive information provided by BRACAnalysis without the financial burden of out-of-pocket expenses."

As our sister publication Pharmacogenomics Reporter notes, Myriad is the only commercial US provider of BRCA testing and "this classification will likely broaden access to Myriad's BRCA tests."

When DTC Testing Isn't Enough

In a guest post at the Genomes Unzipped blog, two researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, discuss how genotype imputation could help consumers get more information out of their 23andMe testing results by predicting or "imputing" variants that are not assayed by the genotyping chip.

Berkeley's Peter Cheng and Eliana Hechter say that the imputation process involves comparing 23andMe data — or data from some other direct-to-consumer testing company — with a reference panel from the 1000 Genomes or HapMap projects. Since these reference datasets have a much larger pool of SNPs than DTC chips test for and because humans have a common genetic ancestry, the imputation algorithms can predict other variations that would likely be present in the user's genome if it was fully sequenced.

Basically, "the imputation algorithm models your genome as a mosaic of related genomes, and uses these related genomes to fill in all of your missing data," the post says.

There are different programs that can be used to predict genotypes. Hechter and Cheng say they used one called Impute2 which was developed by a team from the University of Oxford. They've also written a handy script that transforms 23andMe raw data files into a format that is compatible with Impute2.

Hechter and Cheng do note that 23andMe updates its genotyping chip from time to time and customers can upgrade their data for a fee.

And the results appear to be quite accurate, according to the post. "To give a rough idea, the average confidence was 97.58 percent across all SNPs [Cheng] imputed in his own genome," they write.

Also, Hechter says she was able to impute BRCA2 variants that she quite likely has, which are not included on the 23andMe chip.

Back to Work

Roger Perlmutter is to take the helm of Merck's research and development branch, the Wall Street Journal reports. Previously, Perlmutter was the executive vice president of research and development at Amgen until his retirement about a year ago and prior to joining Amgen he was worked in basic research at Merck. "By hiring Dr. Perlmutter, Merck is tapping into his experience in the field of biotechnology-style drugs, in which Amgen was a pioneer," the Journal notes. While at Amgen, Perlmutter oversaw the FDA approval of a number of drugs.

"I am honored to have the opportunity to return to Merck and to lead MRL," Perlmutter says. Perlmutter is to replace Peter Kim, who is retiring in August. The Journal adds that under Kim, Merck garnered the approval of a number of vaccines and drug, but has recently been beset by setbacks.

This Week in Science

In this week's Science, a team led by researchers from Heinrich Heine University and Oklahoma State University report on the discovery that the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria, which lives in the toxic conditions of volcanic sulfur springs, acquired some of the genes it needs to survive from simpler organisms such as bacteria. The investigators sequenced the alga's genome and found acquired at least 75 genes through horizontal gene transfer. Around 5 percent of the alga's protein-coding genes were transferred from prokaryotes in this manner, including ones involved in "ecologically important processes ranging from heavy-metal detoxification to glycerol uptake and metabolism," the researchers write.

Also in Science, scientists from GlaxoSmithKline and Stanford University urge the inclusion of patients' clinical, social, and environmental histories along with genomic data to develop true personalized medicines. Focusing on genomics alone without giving consideration to other factors that affect patient outcomes could lead to "depersonalized" medicine, they warn, adding that an "emphasis on personal attributes of patients and their environments, and to incorporate these features into an enriched approach to personalized medicine" is needed to "complement the power of genomics."

Technical Tweaks

After making a big splash at the 2012 Advances in Genome Biology and Technology meeting in Marco Island, Fla., Oxford Nanopore kept fairly mum this year, as our sister publication In Sequence noted, citing arbitration and technical issues as possible causes.

Indeed, the company has been facing technical setbacks, blogger Nick Loman from Birmingham University writes at Pathogens: Genes and Genomes, drawing on a barroom conversation with Clive Brown, the company's chief technology officer, at AGBT.

The MinIon's senor chip wasn't working as the company liked, so that component had to be re-designed. "That put us back about 5 months, but it was the right thing to do," Brown told Loman. Loman also reports that the company is also working on keeping the lipid bilayer it uses from degrading and on reducing its error rate to 1 percent. Last year, as In Sequence reported at the time, the company announced it had a 4 percent error rate.

Oxford Nanopore declined to comment further, but did not deny any information from the blog post, saying it should have made it clearer that parts of the conversation were off the record, as it did with other news organizations.

Brown further expressed frustration to Loman that he and his company are repeatedly asked by both the community and the media about why they have not released data nor met their anticipated 2012 commercialization goal. Brown added that data from the company's early-access program should come out this year.

After the Cancer Genome Atlas

The Cancer Genome Atlas is set to finish up next year after sequencing some 10,000 samples from about 20 different cancer types. TCGA has found, ScienceInsider notes, a number of new cancer genes and confirmed others that were previously identified. But with its price tag reaching over $375 million, some critics say it has been too expensive, though many disagree.

At a National Cancer Institute meeting earlier this week, Louis Staudt and Stephen Chanock discussed what could be a next step — by sequencing even more samples, say 10,000 per tumor type, researchers could uncover rare variants contributing to the disease, ScienceInsider adds. Further, it could enable studies examining the interplay of genetics and environmental factors.

However, with the agency facing a 5 percent budget cut, such a grand project might not be realized. ScienceInsider also notes that some skeptics said that the project might reach a level of "diminishing returns." According to ScienceInsider Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory's Bruce Stillman noted that he is a supporter of TCGA, but that taking it to such a new scale "is not very sensible at the moment."

Special Look

Sexism unfortunately still exists in science in the US and Europe, begins an editorial in this week's special issue of Nature. While progress has been made to combat sexism, it appears to have stalled — women in the US and Europe earn about half of all the science doctoral degrees awarded, yet make up about a fifth of full professors, the editorial adds. Practical issues like childcare likely hinder the careers of many women, but there is "a second, more insidious major problem: overt or unconscious gender bias," the editorial says.

In a separate article, Jennifer Raymond, a Stanford University neurobiologist, writes that most people associate men with science and careers and women with liberal arts and family, and points to the recent PNAS paper from Jo Handelsman at Yale University that showed that researchers were more likely to hire a male undergraduate laboratory manger over a female one, even if their CVs were identical. The female applicants were also offered a smaller salary.

"There is now sufficient evidence to move us beyond the denial phase of dealing with gender bias. Yet in talking to colleagues around the world, I find continued resistance to the idea that scientists, who take pride in being rational and objective, could be influenced by bias," Raymond says. She offers ways for researchers, and others, to work to overcome their biases, such as using a gender-blind review or to consciously mentor female scientists.

Also in Nature, Brigitte Mühlenbruch from the European Platform of Women Scientists and University of Duisburg-Essen's Maren Jochimsen write that broad changes are needed to bring equality to science. "To achieve lasting equality, science needs a culture that is sensitive to gender and diversity in all its endeavours: individual and social, structural, institutional and political," they write. "We need transparency, accountability and monitoring in decision-making, evaluation, recruitment, attribution and funding. We need to secure the interest and collaboration of highly qualified women and men by offering predictable academic careers, attractive working places and conditions that enable work and life to be reconciled."

Other aspects of the special issue focus on women in biotech, equality for female scientists around the world, equality at journals, and more.

This Week in Nature

In Nature this week, a team from Wageningen University reports on the identification of a gene that regulates the initiation of tuber development and plant maturity in potatoes. The plant originated in the Andes and evolved short day-dependent tuber formation as a propagation strategy. In more northern latitudes such as the US and Europe, potatoes needed to adapt to being grown in long-day conditions. The researchers identified a gene responsible for early tuberization in such an environment and suggest that the trait helped form the basis for the plant's domestication in northern countries.

Meanwhile, in Nature Genetics, researchers from the University of Michigan describe newly identified genetic variants associated with age-related macular degeneration. They conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for the disease, including over 17,000 individuals with advanced AMD and 60,000 healthy controls. They found seven genomic regions newly associated with AMD risk and 19 associated regions overall, providing "new directions for biological, genetic and therapeutic studies of AMD."

Our sister publication GenomeWeb Daily News has more on this report here.

The Proteoform

In correspondence to Nature Methods, Lloyd Smith, Neil Kelleher, and the Consortium for Top Down Proteomics suggest the term "proteoform" to describe all the shapes that a protein can assume. "Given the importance of capturing this protein variation in basic and translational research, and that technologies now exist to reveal it, we point out an ongoing problem in nomenclature regarding what to call it," they write.

Smith and his colleagues add that many of currently used terms are imprecise — 'isoform' actually refers to genetic, not protein, variations, while the phrase 'protein species' cannot "distinguish between proteins originating from different genes and those originating from a single gene."

'Proteoform', they say, will help solve these issues, and they have begun using it in their work. "We find it to be intuitive and readily grasped by readers and audiences. It has an aesthetic appeal, as the simple protein analog of the genetic term 'isoform'," they add.

"It just catches on … it fills a void the rolls right off the tongue at conferences and sits well in the gut while digesting text," Kelleher tells Nature Methods' Methagora blog.