This Week in PLOS

Relaxation practices such as yoga, meditation, and repetitive prayer are associated with shifts in the expression of metabolic, immune, and stress response pathways genes, according to a study in PLOS One. A Massachusetts-led team did array-based gene expression analyses on blood samples from 26 healthy individuals over eight weeks, as each embarked on a relaxation response program. This gene expression data, coupled with a systems biology network analysis, suggest that both short and longer term relaxation practices can produce a dip in the stress response and inflammation-related gene expression, along with a boost in the expression of certain metabolic, insulin, and mitochondrial genes.

Researchers from Brazil and France looked at the relationship between a Chagas disease-causing parasite and its insect host for another PLOS One study. The team developed complementary DNA libraries with RNA from the guts of Triatoma infestans insects that did or did not carry the Chagas disease parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi. The resulting expressed sequence tag data revealed genes with an uptick or decline in expression in the infected insects. The study's authors also saw metabolic- and immune-related transcripts with similar expression profiles under both conditions. "[T]his work provides the first global analysis of expression profiles from the midgut of a Chagas disease vector under T. cruzi infection," they write, "with a resulting repertoire of transcripts that are important in the elucidation of metabolic processes in T. infestans."

In PLOS Genetics, researchers from Canada and the US describe the approach they used to look at the interplay between nucleosome architecture and transcriptional regulation. The team tracked nucleosome position patterns in dozens of yeast strains carrying loss-of-function deletions or conditional mutations to genes influencing histone, chromatin, or transcription-related processes. Together with information on yeast strains treated with compounds known to alter some of the same pathways, findings from the experiment "confirm and extend the roles of chromatin remodelers and chaperones as major determinants of genic nucleosome positioning," the researchers write, "and these data provide a valuable resource for future studies."

Hard Choices

Earlier non-invasive prenatal testing can lead to difficult decisions for prospective parents, USA Today writes. "Rapid technological advances are opening up a new era, doctors say — one in which couples have an unprecedented glimpse of the forming child, and with this new information an often-wrenching choice: proceed with the pregnancy or terminate it," it adds.

Because they are not invasive, early screens will likely appeal to more women, the paper adds, noting that only about 2 percent of women opt for invasive testing, though such tests may be used to confirm NIPT results. Newer cell-free DNA screens, like the one from Sequenom, among other companies, can be conducted as early as nine weeks. Early results allow women with negative results to bypass invasive screening and enable women with positive results to, if they choose, undergo an earlier termination, which carries fewer risks, USA Today says.

While advances in technology are giving prospective parents more information, and earlier, the choice they face remains the same. "This technology has not given us some way to magically prevent the condition or cure the baby," Ruth Faden, director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, says. "The pregnancy will be terminated or the baby will be born with it."

And that decision is intensely personal. Melanie Perkins McLaughlin, who received a Down syndrome diagnosis 20 weeks into her pregnancy, continued her pregnancy and now talks to other prospective parents with that diagnosis. "I would never in a million years judge them," McLaughlin tells USA Today. "Who is anybody else to judge somebody in that situation? Even if you've been in that position, with a prenatal diagnosis, everyone is an individual and every situation is different."

Poli-Sci and the Rest Will Follow

New efforts in by Republicans in Congress to require that the National Science Foundation ensure that the studies it funds meet certain criteria that lawmakers would judge have stirred up questions about whether any science may be safe from grant-level oversight by lawmakers.

LiveScience contributor Wynne Parry writes that the efforts by Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas) and Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) have created "a battle over science" by trying to make NSF justify to Congress the value to society of the research projects that it funds.

Writing in Science today, Columbia University Professor Kenneth Prewitt says that Coburn's recent success in forcing NSF to certify that any political science projects it funds are promoting the national security and economic interests of the US could open the door to even broader efforts to meddle in the scientific enterprise.

"Every scientific discipline has a stake in undoing the damage inflicted on political science, and, in fact, to the national interest, by the Coburn criteria," Prewitt says, adding that scientists "should vigorously contest any effort to apply those criteria more broadly."

This week, Smith proposed legislation that would expand on Coburn's political science clause and require that NSF certify that all of its research advances "the national health, prosperity, and welfare" of the US.

Prewitt says there are there are three major problems with these sorts of rules, which enable lawmakers to "micromanage" science funding.

Rules like these favor research with near-term benefits, but overlook the long-term potential of lines of inquiry that may pay off in unknown ways. He says that Congress has a history of supporting both present and future-oriented research, the likes of which led to the development of the Internet.

"Today, we cannot know how and when the science of the Higgs boson subatomic particle will prove useful. But conditions will change; the knowledge will be used," Prewitt writes.

Criteria like that in Coburn's amendment also "weaken the way science builds theories," and miss the larger point that "science is an interconnected enterprise."

Lastly, the peer review process will be hurt by such rules, Prewitt argues, because "Congressional intimidation" will lead scientists to pursue the kinds of projects that lawmakers want, and avoiding those that some do not want, such as research that hits political hot-buttons, like studies involving climate change, stem cells, and evolution.

This Week in Science

In Science this week, a group of Chinese researchers report on the use of reverse genetics to gain insights into how H5N1 avian flu can spread to, and between, mammals. In the past, avian flu viruses have crossed species barriers by reassorting with mammal-infective viruses in intermediate livestock hosts. The team created 127 reassortant viruses between a duck isolate of H5N1 and a highly transmissible human H1N1 virus. They tested the viruses' virulence in mice and transmissibility to guinea pigs, which both have avian and mammalian types of airway receptors, and found that some reassortments were transmissible by airborne droplet, although they were not lethal. The findings indicate that avian H5N1 subtype viruses have the "potential to acquire mammalian transmissibility by reassortment," the researchers write.

Also in Science, researchers from the University of Oxford publish data giving clues about how one type of long, non-coding RNA, or lncRNA, is regulated. The investigators found that an lncRNA they had identified in Arabidopsis is regulated through its interaction with an R-loop, a triple-stranded nucleic acid structure formed by an RNA/DNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA. Based on the findings, the team concludes that differential stabilization of R-loops could be a "general mechanism influencing gene expression in many organisms."

There You Are

Harvard University researchers were able to correctly identify between 84 percent and 97 percent of Personal Genome Project participants through demographic information they provided.

The Personal Genome Project, led by George Church at Harvard Medical School, began about a half dozen years ago to examine the interactions among genotype, the environment, and phenotype. Project participants provide genomic information as well as health information and some other personal data. The project notes that privacy cannot be guaranteed, though the online profiles do not include names or addresses.

Latanya Sweeney and her colleagues write in a paper, available at the arXiv preprint server, that they matched demographic data— such as ZIP code, age, and gender — from 579 of 1,130 public PGP profiles to data housed in voter or other public records. From this, they received 241 unique matches.

The researchers shared their findings with the PGP to determine the accuracy of their matches. According to the response from the PGP, 84 percent of Sweeney and her team's matches were correct, and, the researchers note, if nicknames were taken into consideration, that proportion of correct matches increases to 97 percent. "Our ability to learn their names is based on their demographics, not their DNA, thereby revisiting an old vulnerability that could be easily thwarted with minimal loss of research value," they write.

Sweeney and her colleagues add that by making age and location data a bit fuzzier, PGP participants would be able to protect themselves from identification. They note that they developed a tool to help PGP participants make such changes.

"That should make the Personal Genome Project significantly more private for those who choose this option. It should also serve as a warning for future projects involving personal data that privacy isn't always as easy to protect as it might at first seem," the Physics arXiv blog adds.

Curiosity and the Cat…

A Florida teen was expelled and charged with a felony after a science project she was working on led to what Riptide, a news blog at the Miami New Times, describes as a "tiny pop and a small amount of smoke." No one was injured and there was no damage.

Kiera Wilmot, a 16-year-old student at Bartow High School, was known to have a good record, and the principal there, Ron Pritchard, said Wilmot "is a good kid," according to Tampa Bay's News 10.

"She made a bad choice," Pritchard said, adding that "she wanted to see what would happen [when the chemicals mixed] and was shocked by what it did." Riptide adds that she mixed toilet bowl cleaner and aluminum foil in a plastic water bottle.

Wilmot is to be tried as an adult on charges of possessing/discharging a weapon on school grounds and discharging a destructive device. The school district adds that she was expelled as students need to know "there are consequences to their actions," according to Riptide

At Southern Fried Science, Andrew David Thaler wonders if responses like that will stifle scientific curiosity. "Many young scientists have a brush with danger due to a combination of curiosity and experimentation," he writes. "High school programs should be nurturing that curiosity and fostering responsible experimentation, not punishing it."

Thaler also asked Twitter followers, many of whom he says are current scientists, whether they had had any such lab mishaps in high school. He has a Storify of their responses. For example, @rasliche tweeted: "Launched rocket in hs that tipped after igniting, shot at class, hit building window. No damage, but def not safe. Got A+."

While Daily Scan never caused the sprinklers to go off, there was a harrowing incident with some ethidium bromide.

Yo Momma's Genome

File this under "sentences we never thought we'd type:" If you haven't checked out the "YoMammasGenomeSoFat" hashtag on Twitter, you should really stop whatever you're doing right now and take a look.

Yes, the life sciences community is trying its collective hand at "Yo Momma" jokes, and, what do you know, it turns out applying genomics geekery to insult comedy is a lot of fun.

For instance, from @pdoofus: "#YoMammasGenomeSoFat her introns don't get spliced…they get bariatric surgery."

And then you have your more inside baseball jokers like @evolvability, who mixes in a little sequencing platform humor: "#YoMammasGenomeSoFat it makes PacBio look like short read technology" and @Graham_Coop, who can't resist taking a swipe at the scientific press's coverage of the ENCODE project: "#YoMammasGenomeSoFat even encode press coverage thinks it can't all be functional ;-)"

Good times.

This Week in Nature

Based on genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses of nearly 400 tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network team uncovered four subtypes of endometrial cancer, as it reports in Nature this week. These four categories subdivide the tumors based on their mutation frequency: POLE ultramutated, microsatellite instability hypermutated, copy-number low, and copy-number high tumors. "This integrated analysis provides key molecular insights into tumour classification, which may have a direct effect on treatment recommendations for patients, and provides opportunities for genome-guided clinical trials and drug development," the researchers write.

Daily Scan sister publication GenomeWeb Daily News has more on this study here.

Also in Nature, researchers led by Roland Beckmann from the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Germany present the structures of both the human and fruit fly 80S ribosomes in complex with translation factor eEF2, E-site transfer RNA, and Stm1-like proteins. Using high-resolution cryo-electron-microscopy density maps, predicted secondary structures for rRNA expansion segments, and the yeast and Tetrahymena 80S crystal structures, the researchers built molecular models of the Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster subunits. "These structures not only illustrate the co-evolution of metazoan-specific ribosomal RNA with ribosomal proteins but also reveal the presence of two additional structural layers in metazoan ribosomes, a well-ordered inner layer covered by a flexible RNA outer layer," the authors note.

Over in Nature Genetics, BGI researchers and their colleagues report on the draft genomes of two turtles, the soft-shell turtle and the green sea turtle. Their results point to a split from the bird-crocodilian lineage about 267.9 million years ago to 248.3 million years ago. In addition, they uncover evidence of expansions in olfactory receptor genes in these two turtles, which may be due to a gene duplication event. All in all their "results suggest that turtle evolution was accompanied by an unexpectedly conservative vertebrate phylotypic period, followed by turtle-specific repatterning of development to yield the novel structure of the shell," the researchers write.

GWDN also covers this article here.

The Accountability Layer

Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who heads the US House of Representatives science committee, defends his draft legislation aimed at changing the peer-review process at the National Science Foundation, the Huffington Post reports.

That draft bill would require NSF to certify that all research it funds advances the "health, prosperity, or welfare" of the US, addresses questions of societal importance, and does not duplicate any other federally funded study. Critics say that the peer-review system should not be tinkered with.

Smith, though, says he wants to ensure that taxpayers' money is well spent. "The draft bill maintains the current peer review process and improves on it by adding a layer of accountability. The intent of the draft legislation is to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent on the highest-quality research possible," he says in a statement, according to the Huffington Post.

Concerns Resolved

The new H7N9 avian flu virus was quickly sequenced, shared, and published, but not without some concerns regarding credit, Nature reports. A team from Beijing's Chinese National Influenza Center uploaded the genetic sequence of the virus, determined from the first three patients, on March 31st to Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data database, and it submitted its H7N9 paper to the New England Journal of Medicine on April 5th.

At the same time, Nature says, Novartis and the J. Craig Venter Institute were working on using those uploaded sequences to develop a vaccine in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but not with the Chinese National Influenza Center team — something the CNIC team thought was not in the cooperative spirit of GISAID. Novartis says it looked into working with the Chinese CDC, which includes the CNIC, Nature notes.

GISAID was able to help address these concerns and open lines of communication between thr groups, Nature adds. The Chinese team and the vaccine developers are now working together.

The CNIC team was also worried about being scooped by a Tokyo group that analyzed the viral data. That group's Eurosurveillance paper was scheduled to come out before Chinese team's NEJM article, so to avoid the issue of scooping the Chinese team, the publication of the Eurosurveillance paper was delayed. An author of the Eurosurveillance paper adds that the delay had no effect on public health as the group shared its analyses with the World Health Organization's network of flu researchers earlier in the month.

Emergence of Resistance

Researchers led by the University of Oxford's Dominic Kwiatkowski identified three subpopulations of the malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium falciparum that appear to be resistant to artemisinin, as they report in Nature Genetics this week. Kwiatkowski and his team genotyped 86,158 coding SNPs in 825 parasite samples obtained from locations in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, The Gambia, Cambodia Thailand, and Vietnam.

The Cambodian samples, isolated from four different spots in the country, contain three drug-resistant subpopulations, and also appear to harbor greater genetic diversity than the other parasite samples. Further, the samples from western Cambodia, where resistance was detected, differ from each other as well as from eastern Cambodian samples and from other Southeast Asian or African samples.

"For the first time we have identified the emergence of sub-populations associated with a drug resistance to artemisinin," first author Olivo Miotto tells the New Scientist.

New Scientist adds that Cambodia is thought to be a hotspot for resistance, possibly due to how malaria was generally treated there.

This Week in Nucleic Acids Research

Japanese researchers report on efforts to characterize gene expression, metabolism, growth patterns, and more in a fission yeast strain with a whittled down, or reduced representation, genome. In an effort to define a core set of essential genes, the team used a large-scale gene deletion strategy to lop off four large stretches of sequence from the already compact Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome. The resulting strain, which was missing hundreds of thousands of bases and an estimated 223 protein-coding genes, was somewhat hindered in taking up glucose and amino acids, they report. It also showed shifts in some metabolic, gene expression, and protein patterns.

Washington University's Robi Mitra and colleagues outline a method for charting DNA methylation marks in heterogeneous cells from normal or diseased tissue samples. The team demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach — called laser capture microdissection-reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, or LCM-RRBS — using tissue from mice with a type of tumor called gonadectomy-induced adrenocrotical neoplasia. The approach proved useful for comparing methylation profiles in the tumor and nearby normal tissue, study authors note, arguing that the method "will facilitate the investigation of DNA methylation in cancer and organ development."

Finally, a team from Belgium, the UK, and the US explore approaches for detecting structural variants that crop up in a single cell over the course of a cell cycle. Using paired-end sequence data from DNA from individual breast cancer or blastomere cells that had undergone whole-genome amplification, the researchers showed off their analytical methods, which make it possible to pick up copy number changes or rearrangements affecting a few dozen to thousands of DNA bases. Their analyses also looked at the artifacts introduced during whole-genome amplification process with an eye to weeding them out during structural variant detection.

Differing Criteria

Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is drafting a bill to change how the National Science Foundation chooses which research to fund, ScienceInsider reports. Smith is the new chair of the US House of Representatives' science committee.

President Barack Obama, though, said in a speech to the National Academy of Sciences that he would work to "make sure that our scientific research does not fall victim to political maneuvers or agendas that in some ways would impact on the integrity of the scientific process," the Huffington Post adds.

This draft bill, entitled the High Quality Research Act, "represents the latest — and bluntest — attack on NSF by congressional Republicans seeking to halt what they believe is frivolous and wasteful research being funded in the social sciences," ScienceInsider says, adding that the bill would be applicable across the disciplines NSF funds.

The draft version of the legislation that ScienceInsider obtained would have NSF certify that studies it funds meet three criteria: that they "advance the national health, prosperity, or welfare" of the US or its defense; be of high quality and address questions of societal importance; and not duplicate another study funded by any federal agency. Smith's legislation also indicates that such guidelines could later be applied to other science agencies.

Derek Lowe at In the Pipeline calls this a "dumb" idea and that such certification would be "silly grandstanding."

"Research, though, does not and cannot follow these guidelines. A lot of stuff gets looked into that doesn't work out, and a lot of things that do work out don't look like they're ever going to be of much use for anything," he adds. "We are not smart enough to put bets down on only the really important stuff up front."

Rhett Allain at Dot Physics echoes that thought, giving the example of the laser. "Do you think when people started playing with lasers they had the DVD player in mind? No. You get these awesome things by funding basic research."

Allain adds that he would also welcome duplicated projects as they can help determine whether a finding is real.

Smith also asked NSF to provide him with more information regarding five NSF grants, including reviewer comments and notes from the program officer, ScienceInsider adds. He wrote in a letter to Cora Marrett, the acting NSF director, that he had "concerns regarding some grants approved by the Foundation and how closely they adhere to NSF's 'intellectual merit' guideline."

Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), the ranking Democrat on the science committee, cautioned Smith against interfering with the peer-review process. "The moment you compromise both the merit review process and the basic research mission of NSF is the moment you undo everything that has enabled NSF to contribute so profoundly to our national health, prosperity, and welfare," she wrote in a letter.

Similarly, Obama said in his NAS speech that the peer-review system had to be independent. "In order for us to maintain our edge, we've got to protect our rigorous peer review system," he said, according to the Nature News blog.