This Week's Nature

In this week’s Nature Genetics, a group of Harvard University researchers report the sequences of the genomes of a collection of Streptococcus pneumonia, the pathogen responsible for pneumonia, bacteraemia, and meningitis. The scientists sequenced the whole genomes of 616 asymptomatically carried pneumococci, obtained from children living in Massachusetts between 2000 and 2007, and found that the pneumococcal population was disrupted by the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and that changes in pneumococcal serotype are largely responsible for the decline in invasive pneumococcal disease afterwards.

Also in Nature Genetics, a Stanford University team published the results of a proteomic and bioinformatics analysis of SWI/SNF complexes, known to be tumor suppressors, uncovering greater than expected roles in human malignancies. A proteomic analysis of endogenous mammalian SWI/SNF complexes revealed several new dedicated, stable subunits not found in yeast SWI/SNF complexes. The investigators also found that mammalian SWI/SNF subunits are mutated in 19.6 percent of all human tumors reported in 44 studies, suggesting that specific subunits protect against cancer in specific tissues. They also discovered that mutations affecting more than one subunit are “prevalent in certain cancers.” Taken together, the data indicate that proper functioning of polymorphic SWI/SNF complexes may constitute a “major mechanism of tumor suppression.”

Visions of Treelight

A group of synthetic biology do-it-yourself researchers want to develop and sell glow-in-the-dark plants that could be used as decoration or, in the case of trees, to light streets, Andrew Pollack writes in the New York Times.

The plan is to work out of the BioCurious hacker lab space in Silicon Valley to initially splice DNA from a luminous organism like a jellyfish or marine bacterium into an Arabidopsis mustard plant and to move on to other plants later.\

The partners, including San Francisco tech entrepreneur Antony Evans and Omri Amirav-Drory, who runs a firm called Genome Compiler, also hope that their project will inspire others to pursue independent biology engineering, Pollack writes.

To fund the effort, the partners have raised $250,000 from around 4,500 Kickstarter donors in around two weeks, the Times reports.

“We hope to have a plant which you can visibly see in the dark (like glow-in-the-dark paint), but don’t expect to replace your light bulbs with version 1.0,” according to the project's Kickstarter page.

Not surprisingly, the plan has drawn concerned criticism from environmental groups, including Friends of the Earth and the ETC Group, who have asked Kickstarter to remove the project from its website and have asked the US Department of Agriculture to take some action, according to the Times.

The environmental groups said that the glowing mustard plant project will lead to the "widespread and uncontrolled release of bioengineered seeds and plants through the controversial and risky techniques of synthetic biology," Pollack notes.

So far, Kickstarter has told the critics to talk to the project's partners, and USDA has not responded to the letter, according to the Times.

Not So Anonymous

Participants in human genomics studies are typically guaranteed anonymity, a practice intended to safeguard against use of an individual's data by outside parties like insurers or employers.

Just how anonymous, though, is this anonymous data?
This week in Nature, Erica Check Hayden profiles Whitehead Institute researcher Yaniv Erlich, a computational biologist who is applying lessons learned from his days as a hacker to investigate the security of genomic study data. And this data, it turns out, isn't all that secure.

For instance, Check Hayden reports, in a paper published in Science this January, Erlich's lab demonstrated they could identify participants in genetic research studies by cross-referencing their genetic data with publicly available information like age and place of residence.

Using a software program he and an undergraduate student had developed for profiling short tandem repeats, Erlich identified nearly 50 supposedly anonymous participants from the 1000 Genomes project.

As Check Hayden observes, this wasn't the first time someone had demonstrated that it was possible to identify study participants based on their data. Those past efforts, though, had relied on other sources of research data.

"Erlich's study," she writes, "upped the stakes, because it showed that it was possible to identify people from their genetic data by linking not to other sources of research data, but to information freely available on the Internet."

How, exactly, the community can and will address this issue isn't entirely clear, but regardless, Check Hayden says, Erlich has helped move the problem into the spotlight.

747 Complexity

Even 'intelligent design' proponents need evolution for their ideas to work, Gerhard Adam writes in Science 2.0.

The common critique that advocates of 'intelligent design' level against evolutionary biology is that there are instances of complexity in the natural world that cannot have evolved, and must have had a designer.

But Adam says that even the examples and analogies they provide for evidence of a designer have required evolution to become what they are.

Take a look at the example of the 747 jumbo jet, which has been used as an analogy to biological phenomena that intelligent design advocates see as being far too complex to have arisen through randomness, Adam says.

Leaving aside the "complete misunderstanding about randomness," Adam notes: where did the design for the 747 come from?

"We can immediately see that it didn't occur directly, but rather was the result of an evolutionary process beginning with the Wright Brothers [and even previous unsuccessful attempts at flight]," he says.

The same holds for finely crafted and complex watches, or any other complex objects that are proposed as too complex.

"Rather the object in question is invariably the result of design, evolution, and selection. At each design step, the characteristics that work best get selected for incorporation in future versions of the object. There are simply no exceptions," Adam adds.

Any such object that exhibits design also "exhibits evolution and selection," he says, pointing out that it is "what we call progress."

This Week in Genome Biology

Queen Mary University of London's Pedro Cutillas and colleagues from the UK describe phosphoproteomic analyses of cancer cell lines and potential applications of this information in the early, online edition of Genome Biology. When the researchers used mass spectrometry to assess phosphorylation levels at some 2,000 sites in nine cancer cell lines — three representatives apiece from acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma — they found that cell lines tended to cluster by cancer type. And the team's more in-depth analysis of seven AML lines suggested phosphoproteomics can provide clues to which tumor samples are more or less apt to respond to compounds that inhibit kinase enzymes.

A Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute team outlines a new computational method for surmising the sorts of mutational processes at play in cancer genomes. After applying this probabilistic inference approach, called Emu, to simulated data, the researchers used it to scour sequences from 21 previously sequenced breast cancer samples. Those tumors harbored signs of four main mutational processes, study authors explained. And in conjunction with known functional annotations in the genome, the nature of the mutations and their locations offered clues to some of the biological processes going awry in the tumors.

The human microbiome is home to a range of mobile genetic elements that provide insights into the viral pathogens or plasmids that microbiome members have encountered in the past, according to another Genome Biology study. Researchers from Indiana University and the Roswell Park Cancer Institute sifted through metagenomic sequence data, focusing on spacer sequences at the so-called CRISPR locus, a site in the genome where sequences from potential genetic interlopers are integrated as part of the CRISPR-CAS system used in the bacterial and archaeal immune system. Using data from 95,000 contigs — corresponding to sequences potentially targeted by CRISPR spacers in the metagenomic data — the group was able to tally up and compare the apparent mobile genetic element networks found in the human mouth and gut microbiomes.

Industry, Meet Sequestration

Could the US business community play a role in supporting basic research while the sequestration's spending cuts to federal science budgets are still in effect, asked a group of tech policy watchers in a teleconference yesterday.

In a Scientific American blog post, Larry Greenemeier reports that participants in the Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies conference call were asking what role business could play in making up the funding shortfall that has and will continue to hit the academic research communities as long as the sequester is in effect; it is set to last through 2021.

The big question here is how to make up for cuts in the kinds of early stage research that benefits industry in the long-term, but which companies do not want or cannot afford to pursue, Greenemeier says.

C-PET President Nigel Cameron said in the call that Apple, which ended its most recent earnings period holding $145 billion in cash, “is sitting on more money than the federal government spends on all of its discretionary R&D combined.”

It is conceivable that the business community could cover some of the gap in early stage R&D that the sequester has created, Greenemeier writes.

How companies would explain such expenses to their shareholders, however, may be another matter. But if they do not choose to spend cash on funding basic research, businesses may want to burn some of their extra dough lobbying Congress hard to increase the government's flexibility under the sequester, allowing agencies to better allocate their decreased resources, Nagy Hanna, a C-PET senior fellow said during the call.

The aim of such a lobbying effort would be to impress upon policymakers how important basic R&D is for the greater US economy, as well as university systems.

Ashkenazi Origins

A fracas among scientists has broken out over whether genomic information has shown that most Jews share a common origin place in the Middle East, a question that has implications over racial and ethnic identity issues, but also may be tied to claims about rights to land, Rita Rubin writes in the Jewish Daily Forward.

The central dispute is about the long-asked question: "Where in the world did Ashkenazi Jews come from?" Rubin explains.

A long-standing hypothesis has been that Ashkenazi Jews have a common Middle Eastern ancestry with most other Jews.

Rubin writes that this explanation "affirms the understanding that many Jews themselves hold of who they are in the world:" one people with an ethnic and racial bond who have scattered over the millennia.

The common Middle Eastern origin explanation is well established, and has genetic evidence to back it up. It asserts the Rhineland hypothesis, which maintains that Jews who fled Palestine in the Seventh Century ended up in Eastern Europe and Germany in the Middle Ages, and is espoused by Harry Ostrer, a professor of pathology and genetics at Yeshiva University's Einstein College of Medicine and author of the book "Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People."

Now a Johns Hopkins University post-doc named Eran Elhaik has proposed that this hypothesis is wrong, and says that he has proven that Ashkenazi Jews are from the Caucusus, and that they are descended from a group called the Khazars.

He says in "The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses," published in Genome Biology and Evolution in December, that the genetic heterogeneity of Ashkenazis is evidence for the Khazarian explanation, and that a common genetic marker found in DNA from Jews may have come from Iran.

Christian de Duve Dies

Christian de Duve, who won the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, has died, the New York Times reports. He was 95. De Duve discovered the lysosome and received the Nobel along with Albert Claude, who discovered mitochondria, and George Palade, who uncovered the ribosome, "for their discoveries concerning the structural and functional organization of the cell," according to the Nobel Foundation.

Those discoveries, the Times notes, paved the way for modern cell biology, and de Duve's finding particularly influenced the study of Tay-Sachs disease and other genetic lysosomal storage disorders. "We are sick because our cells are sick," de Duve said.

Bag and Tag the Evidence, Then Tag it Again

To safeguard against contamination or accidental DNA transfer, particularly in forensic laboratories, Boise State University researchers developed a 120-basepair tag to be used as a way to identify samples. As they report in the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, these nullomer barcodes, made up of DNA sequences that are not found in people, could be added to collection devices so DNA samples are tagged upon collection. Further, the researchers note that the barcode could reflect where and when the sample was obtained.

"If a suspect's DNA was tagged and then accidentally mixed with a crime-scene sample it would place them at the scene when perhaps they were not. But the tag's presence would prove that particular DNA sample came from sloppy lab or forensic practice and not the suspect," the New Scientist notes.

The Boise State researchers also show that if they diluted a tagged sample a million fold and drizzled it onto a knife, they could still detect the nullomer tags.

Eugenie Scott to Leave NCSE

Eugenie Scott, the founding CEO of the National Center for Science Education, will be leaving that post at the end of the year, ScienceInsider reports. NCSE defends the teaching of evolution and climate change in science classrooms in the US.

Scott founded NCSE in 1987 to combat efforts to introduce creationism into local schools near the University of Kentucky, where she was a faculty member. With 15 people now part of NCSE, ScienceInsider notes that the organization has become a more than $1 million a year operation that supplies resources and advice to teachers and keeps an eye on legislation.

"We've learned from Day 1 that you don't blunt those attacks by simply shoveling science onto the debate," Scott says. "You need to recognize the political and economic and cultural issues in play. In the end, it comes down to your powers of persuasion."

The search for Scott's successor is underway, NCSE adds.

This Week in PNAS

A University of California-led team sequenced the genomes of dozens of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis isolates in an effort to understand the evolutionary history of the fungus — an amphibian pathogen that's had particularly detrimental effects on amphibian populations in the Americas. As they report in the early, online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers found a great deal of genetic diversity amongst 29 B. dendrobatidis isolates collected from sites around the world, consistent with a complex evolutionary history for the fungus. They also saw signs of selective pressure on genes coding for protease enzymes, suggesting these processes are prone to shifts during evolutionary transitions.

Mutations to the RASA1 gene can cause conditions involving abnormalities to the lymphatic fluid-carrying vasculature, according to a study by researchers from Texas and Michigan. The group unearthed frame-shift mutations in RASA1 when they did whole-exome sequencing on a 20-year-old individual with a lymphatic condition called Parkes-Weber syndrome and his unaffected parents. Together with analyses of the affected individual's vasculature, the findings suggest RASA1 mutations may lead to unusual lymphatic vascular architecture, study authors say — a notion supported by experiments in mice missing the RASA1 gene. Even so, RASA1 mutations seem to have variable expressivity since the unaffected father in the exome-sequenced trio carried the same RASA1 alteration found in his Parkes-Weber syndrome-affected son.

For another study slated to appear online this week in PNAS, Cornell University researchers relied on data from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel to tally up natural genetic variation in the fruit fly — information that they used to help find new players in endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathways. The team treated flies from 114 sequenced DGRP lines with an ER stress-inducing compound called tunicamycin. By following flies' survival times and looking at how they corresponded with both array-based gene expression profiles and SNP patterns, the investigators identified 25 candidate ER stress response genes. Their follow-up functional experiments suggested that at least 17 of the genes could be plausible ER stress response pathway participants.

Emil Frei Dies

Emil Frei, an oncologist who worked at the National Cancer Institute, the MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, has died, the New York Times reports. He was 89. The Times notes that, in the mid-1950s, Frei was among the first to promote the use of combination chemotherapy.

Frei, his colleague Emil Freireich at NCI, and others studied the use of multiple chemotherapy agents to treat pediatric leukemia. They found that, in combination, they could use less of each drug, limiting the toxic effects of the drugs on patients, but better attacking the cancer. Among the patients Frei treated was Edward M. Kennedy, Jr., who had osteosarcoma.

Further, the Times notes that in his book, The Emperor of All Maladies, physician and author Siddhartha Mukherjee called Frei a "charming" physician. "To watch him manage critically ill children and their testy, nervous parents was to watch a champion swimmer glide through water — so adept in the art that he made artistry vanish," Mukherjee wrote.

To Be Clearer

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, which recently issued guidelines regarding the return of incidental findings, has published a clarification regarding that statement.

The guidelines, released during the ACMG annual meeting in Phoenix in March, recommended that certain genetic findings uncovered by a lab during whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing of a patient be reported back to the physician and patient, even if those findings were unrelated to why the patient was undergoing testing. For example, if the patient is being tested for mutations linked to heart disease, but sequencing turns up a mutation in, say BRCA1 that predisposes that patient to cancer, that finding should be reported.

After the statement was released, some critics said the report was "too conservative" while others said it overlooked patient autonomy, among other issues.

In its clarification, the ACMG reiterates its thoughts on patient autonomy, reporting findings from children, laboratory policies, communicating results, and predicting disease likelihood.

For example, in addressing patient autonomy, the group says its reason for advising returning results was because its list of mutations and conditions only included pathogenic variants that had a high likelihood of leading to disease. "The rationale for our recommendations was that not reporting a laboratory test result that conveys a near certainty of an adverse yet potentially preventable medical outcome would be unethical," it adds.

In a blog post at the Huffington Post, guideline author Robert Green adds that "autonomy is not removed, but shifted to a more appropriate place" under these guidelines. "[O]rdering physicians should receive a report that includes the potentially dangerous incidental mutation, and thus informed, the physician and patient together can choose to learn more about the illness that it implicates. … Absent the knowledge that such a mutation exists, patients will not have any authentic opportunity to inform themselves or exert any choice over this danger," he adds.