Differing Criteria

Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is drafting a bill to change how the National Science Foundation chooses which research to fund, ScienceInsider reports. Smith is the new chair of the US House of Representatives' science committee.

President Barack Obama, though, said in a speech to the National Academy of Sciences that he would work to "make sure that our scientific research does not fall victim to political maneuvers or agendas that in some ways would impact on the integrity of the scientific process," the Huffington Post adds.

This draft bill, entitled the High Quality Research Act, "represents the latest — and bluntest — attack on NSF by congressional Republicans seeking to halt what they believe is frivolous and wasteful research being funded in the social sciences," ScienceInsider says, adding that the bill would be applicable across the disciplines NSF funds.

The draft version of the legislation that ScienceInsider obtained would have NSF certify that studies it funds meet three criteria: that they "advance the national health, prosperity, or welfare" of the US or its defense; be of high quality and address questions of societal importance; and not duplicate another study funded by any federal agency. Smith's legislation also indicates that such guidelines could later be applied to other science agencies.

Derek Lowe at In the Pipeline calls this a "dumb" idea and that such certification would be "silly grandstanding."

"Research, though, does not and cannot follow these guidelines. A lot of stuff gets looked into that doesn't work out, and a lot of things that do work out don't look like they're ever going to be of much use for anything," he adds. "We are not smart enough to put bets down on only the really important stuff up front."

Rhett Allain at Dot Physics echoes that thought, giving the example of the laser. "Do you think when people started playing with lasers they had the DVD player in mind? No. You get these awesome things by funding basic research."

Allain adds that he would also welcome duplicated projects as they can help determine whether a finding is real.

Smith also asked NSF to provide him with more information regarding five NSF grants, including reviewer comments and notes from the program officer, ScienceInsider adds. He wrote in a letter to Cora Marrett, the acting NSF director, that he had "concerns regarding some grants approved by the Foundation and how closely they adhere to NSF's 'intellectual merit' guideline."

Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), the ranking Democrat on the science committee, cautioned Smith against interfering with the peer-review process. "The moment you compromise both the merit review process and the basic research mission of NSF is the moment you undo everything that has enabled NSF to contribute so profoundly to our national health, prosperity, and welfare," she wrote in a letter.

Similarly, Obama said in his NAS speech that the peer-review system had to be independent. "In order for us to maintain our edge, we've got to protect our rigorous peer review system," he said, according to the Nature News blog.

Left Behind?

Sequester spending cuts could delay scientific research for two years, US President Barack Obama said in a speech to the National Academy of Sciences yesterday, the New York Times reports. The academy was celebrating its 150th anniversary.

"Instead of racing ahead on the next cutting-edge discovery, our scientists are left wondering if they'll get to start any new projects, any new research projects at all over the next few years," Obama said, "which means that we could lose a year, two years of scientific research as a practical matter because of misguided priorities here in [Washington, DC]."

The sequester imposes about a 5 percent cut to both the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation budgets.

Those cuts, Obama said, according to LiveScience, are "misguided" and harm the US competitive edge in science."What we produce here ends up having benefits worldwide," he said. "We should be reaching for a level of private and public research and development investment that we haven't seen since the height of the space race, that's my goal."

The Runs Not Done

The Office of Research Integrity has found that a technician at Advance Liquid Logic fabricated data for a project funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Retraction Watch reports.

ORI says that Matthew Poore "knowingly and intentionally falsified reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results by reporting the results from previous experiments as the actual results, when the experiments had not been performed." These results were included in a presentation, a report to NIAID, and in the company's files, ORI adds.

Poore has entered into an agreement to have any of his federally funded research supervised for a period of three years.

Retraction Watch adds Poore appears to have left the company last year.

This Week in PNAS

In the early, online version of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a group from Germany and the US looks at whether post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from childhood events coincides with distinct gene expression and epigenetic profiles in individuals' blood samples. When they compared array-based gene expression and DNA methylation patterns in samples from 61 individuals with PTSD, the investigators found different expression patterns in those who had experienced childhood abuse relative to those who had not — changes that often corresponded to methylation shifts in the childhood trauma group. Expression signatures differed yet again when the team considered blood samples from 108 individuals with a traumatic past but no signs of PTSD.

The transcription factor-coding gene MYBL1 is prone to recurrent, truncating rearrangements in at least one diffuse pediatric low-grade glioma sub-category, according to another study in PNAS. Researchers from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and elsewhere performed copy number analyses on 44 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, representing tumors from several histologically defined diffuse pediatric low-grade glioma sub-categories. Together with whole-genome sequencing on a tumor from the diffuse astrocytoma grade II, or DA2, sub-category, the copy number data pointed to a key alteration in the DA2 tumors: a partial duplication of MYBL1 and truncation of the gene's regulatory domain-coding sequence. The team also saw two tumors in another histological sub-group that harbored truncations to a related gene — MYB — hinting at a role for the transcription factor family in low-grade glioma risk.

An international team led by investigators in the US and Australia describes a high-throughput array for finding stretches of the wheat genome under selection during crop improvement. After selecting target SNPs from transcriptome sequence data on more than two-dozen wheat accessions, the researchers used this chip to put together a genetic diversity map representing nearly 3,000 wheat accessions. Their data highlighted sites of differentiation between populations, for instance, as well as regions of the genome that have undergone selective sweeps as part of the crop improvement processes. For more on this study, check out a related news story in our sister publication GenomeWeb Daily News.

To Court

Patrick Harran, a chemistry professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, is facing prosecution over the death of his research assistant, Sheharbano Sangji, in a lab fire, the Associated Press reports. Harran is facing three counts of felony workplace safety violations in Sangji's death. If convicted, he could be sentenced to up to four and a half years in prison.

Sangji died following a lab fire that started when the syringe she was using to transfer tert-Butyllithium, which can ignite when it contacts air, broke, Reuters adds. Sangji was not wearing a flame-retardant lab coat, and her polyester sweater caught fire.

Prosecutors are accusing Harran of not providing Sangji with the proper training for handling such chemicals. The AP adds that the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health fined UCLA $32,000. The school, Reuters says, was also charged, but its case was dismissed after it adopted new safety measures and established a scholarship in Sangji's name.

Both the school and Harran say what occurred was an accident. "The accident that took Sheri Sangji's life was a terrible tragedy for our campus, and I can't begin to imagine the devastation to her family. We must remember, however, that this was an accident, not a crime," says Gene Block, the chancellor of UCLA, in a statement, according to the AP.

To Find a New Treatment

With more and more cancers being parsed by their genetic mutations, even oncologists can have a hard time keeping up with the variants and which treatments go with them, the New York Times writes.

"There are so many genes and so many mutations," William Pao from Vanderbilt University tells the Times. "The human brain can't memorize all those permutations." He and some colleagues developed a website called My Cancer Genome to keep all those mutations and drugs straight for doctors and patients. For example, clinicians can search the database, which is maintained by a team of more than 50 people from 20 different institutions, for different cancers and mutations and then for related treatments or drug trials.

As the Times points out, to get to the stage of being able to search for treatments for a specific genetic mutation, that mutation first has to be uncovered, and there are more and more tools to do that, it adds. It highlights Foundation Medicine's $5,800 FoundationOne test that profiles tumor genomes.

Fadi Braiteh at the Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada in Las Vegas tells the Times that he has used that test and, while it wasn't helpful for every patient, it did point to a new therapy for a lung cancer patient who was not responding to chemotherapy. "It gave me some guidance," Braiteh said. "We were able to give a drug we've never used before for this mutation."

Hang on, Little Tomato!

Ever take a big bite out of a supermarket tomato and think, "This is just delicious!"? Probably not. After decades of aggressive breeding to make the industrially grown vegetable more durable, the tomato doesn't taste much like a tomato anymore. But hang on, tomatoes, molecular scientists are pondering your palatableness, reports Steve Mirsky in Scientific American.

During a recent scientific meeting in Boston, Harry Klee, professor horticultural sciences at the University of Florida's Department Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, said that although post-World War II "intensive breeding" techniques gave tomatoes a longer shelf life, these commercial gains came at the loss of taste. "Modern tomatoes focus on yields, basically making too many fruit at same time," Klee said during his talk. "The plant can't keep up with filling those fruits with nutrients. So the effect of what the modern breeders have done is basically to take the old tomatoes and add water."

Klee and his colleagues at UFL are working to infuse taste back into the tomato. The team of researchers had a panel of tasters rate heirloom tomatoes of old lineages, then they pulverized the vegetables and analyzed the chemical compounds that influence their taste. In their work, Klee and his colleagues have identified six volatiles – chemical compounds in the tomato that influence a person's sense of taste – that enhance sweetness and two that suppress sweetness.

"These volatiles can really fool the brain," writes Mirsky. For example, tasters rated the Martina tomato variety twice as sweet as the so-called Yellow Jelly Bean tomato, even though the Martina has less sugar. Tasters found the Martina sweeter because that variety has the six sweetness enhancing volatiles in higher concentrations than the Yellow Jelly Bean.

Given these findings, researchers are trying to figure out ways to breed more flavorful tomatoes that still hold up to the demands of mass production. "So that when you say tomato, I don't say blehhh," Mirsky adds.

This Week in PLOS

In PLOS Genetics, the University of Edinburgh's Pamela Wiener and colleagues from the UK and the Netherlands look at genetic signatures coinciding with diversifying selection in European pigs. The team used a pig-specific Porcine60K chip to assess SNP patterns in the genomes of pigs from 13 European breeds and their wild boar cousins. Using data from between two dozen and nearly three dozen pigs per breed, investigators tracked down genetic signatures and/or expression quantitative trait loci corresponding to several breed-specific traits — from color and ear shape to growth patterns and pork production-related features such as fat deposition. The data also revealed signs of past genetic mixing with pigs from Asian breeds, researchers note, study authors note, and point to places in the genome where the European breeds differ from wild boars.

A team from the Universities of Toronto and Minneapolis took a comparative proteomics approach to profiling intrinsically disordered regions in human proteins and their relationships to splicing and protein function. As they report in PLOS Computational Biology, the researchers focused on protein regions known for flexible or constrained disorder. While both types of conserved disorder tend to appear in parts of proteins that are prone to tissue-specific splicing, for instance, they found differences in disorder enrichment depending on the nature, location, and function of the protein-coding exons involved.

Exposure to aerosol forms of the hemorrhagic fever-causing Lassa virus prompts changes in immune gene expression that ultimately compromise effective adaptive immune response to the virus, according to a study in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Researchers from Boston University and elsewhere did array-based gene expression profiling on white blood cells from four non-human primates exposed to Lassa virus aerosols over the two weeks or so before each died from the disease. Based on the sorts of genes showing higher or lower expression at each stage of infection, the study's authors determined that Lassa virus spurs a strong innate immune reaction. But adaptive immune gene response apparently lagged, they note, perhaps due to negative regulation by the virus itself.

Building Better Beer Through Molecular Biology

Most brewers say that making beer is both a science and an art. Biotechniques reports this week that the science of brewing is making great strides thanks to molecular biology tools and technologies.

For instance, one group at Niigata University in Japan recently developed a method to isolate DNA from beer for subsequent PCR analysis. The group used some known primers and also designed novel primers based on species-specific DNA sequences from the main ingredients in beer — barley, yeast, and hops — then analyzed the quality and variety of those ingredients in 22 beer samples.

The Niigata University team also developed a magnetic bead-based sample prep method to separate DNA and eliminate PCR inhibitors from freeze-dried beer samples.

Using these techniques, the researchers were able to identify DNA from yeast, hops, barley, corn, soybean, and rice; and were able to detect 16 different barley cultivars across their samples — findings that they say could improve ingredient quality control or help brewers select the ideal malted barley for their elixirs.

Meantime, Biotechniques reports, James Madison University researcher Christine Hughey is using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to analyze her pint.

After a line of single-hop beers — concoctions all brewed in essentially the same manner save the variety of hops used — piqued her interest, Hughey applied LC-MS to identify the distinguishing chemical characteristics that each hop variety imparted to the beer.

Hughey is now developing software to pinpoint which molecular features are unique to a particular hop in a particular year.

Daily Scan reports that it is happy to be part of a blinded tasting panel to assess the results of these experiments — all in the name of science, of course.

Friends and Foes

The human body is teeming with microorganisms. "John Donne said 'no man is an island,' and Jefferson Airplane said 'He’s a peninsula,' but it now looks like he's actually a metropolis," writes Richard Conniff at Smithsonian magazine.

Conniff notes that recent technological advances have allowed researchers, through initiatives like the Human Microbiome Project, to get a glimpse of 10,000 or so species that call the human body home. Link between changes in the microbiome and disease, Conniff adds, are tantalizing researchers, some clinicians, and even venture capitalists. The public, too, he says, has been drawn in, especially intrigued by links made between the microbiome and obesity.

However, as Conniff writes, too much emphasis is sometimes placed on the role of the microbiome in health and disease with not enough evidence. "I believe the community of microbes that live in and on us is going to be shown to have major influences," Jonathan Eisen from the University of California, Davis, tells him, but Eisen adds that that “is different from actually showing it, and showing it doesn’t mean that we have any idea what to do to treat it."

Still, procedures like fecal transplants are increasingly being used to treat Clostridium difficile infections, and clinical trials of such treatments are underway.

"Coming to understand our microbes not as enemies, but as intimate partners could change our lives at least as dramatically, with time and proper testing," Conniff adds.

HT: Jonathan Eisen at the Tree of Life

Primate Center to Close

Harvard Medical School is shuttering its nearly 50-year-old primate research facility due to cost concerns, the Nature News Blog reports. The New England Primate Research Center currently houses about 2,000 monkeys, which the school says will be transferred to other primate centers or remain at NEPRC during the closure process, which could take two years.

In a statement, the school said that "driving the decision was the fact that the external funding environment for scientific research has become increasingly challenging over the past decade. Recent funding pressures have added uncertainty to this already-challenging fiscal context."

The center, blogger DrugMonkey points out, "lists an impressive series of accomplishments." That list includes contributions to establishing that AIDS is caused by a virus, developing nonhuman primate models of colon cancer and inflammatory bowel disease, and more.

NENPRC has also had its share of troubles. In a blog post, the Boston Globe says that the center had been cited by the US Department of Agriculture for animal welfare violations. The school says its decision to close the center was not related to these problems.

Nancy Haigwood, the director of the Oregon National Primate Research Center, is critical of the move to close the New England facility. "It's very, very disturbing, disappointing, disheartening, shocking," she tells the Globe. "I think it's going to be very, very difficult to imagine that the investigators impacted by this decision will be able to keep up their momentum. We're talking about very talented senior investigators who are at the peak of their careers."

One Step, One Checklist at a Time

Nature Publishing Group has announced a new initiative aimed at improving the reproducibility of research published in articles appearing across its spectrum of journals.

To help with the issue of reproducibility, the publishing company says in a press release it has developed a checklist to help researchers report the details of their methodologies. The checklist "focuses on a small number of often-incompletely reported elements of experimental and analytical design that are crucial to the interpretation of research results; it also consolidates several existing policies about data deposition and presentation," the statement adds.

Nature adds that it will also be changing some of its in-house practices, eliminating length restrictions on methods sections, and may consult with statisticians on certain papers.

It notes in an editorial, though, that this is but a "small step" toward solving the issue of reproducibility. "Tackling these issues is a long-term endeavour that will require the commitment of funders, institutions, researchers and publishers. …. We urge others to take note of these and of our initiatives, and do whatever they can to improve research reproducibility," the editorial adds.

This Week in Science

In this week's Science, a group of Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry researchers describe a new high-resolution mass spectrometric method for identifying and quantifying secreted proteins, demonstrating it on proteins released from immune cells upon receptor ligation. The work "enables a systematic dissection of signaling pathways and the identification of proteins with transcriptionally independent or unexpected extracellular functions," the researchers write.

Also in Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientists Jeremy Wilusz and Phillip Sharp provide an overview of circular RNAs, which had previously only been found in pathogens, but recently have been discovered in a range of species, including humans. One circular RNA in particular is highly abundant in human brains and contains dozens of binding sites for a particular microRNA, miR-7. Because circular RNAs generally have multiple microRNA binding sites, Wilusz and Sharp suggest that other circular RNAs may also regulate the activity of microRNAs. They also propose that circular RNAs may act to bind and sequester RNA-binding proteins or "even base pair with RNAs besides microRNAs, resulting in the formation of large RNA-protein complexes."