Time for a Change?

Peerage of Science, a new online social network for researchers, seeks to change the peer review system, reports ScienceInsider's Jop de Vrieze. Researchers at the University of Jyväskylä and at the University of Eastern Finland have launched the Web site, which de Vrieze says "could eventually replace or supplement the current way journals get scientists to peer review submitted manuscripts." Once researchers submit their manuscripts, members who have volunteered to review papers are alerted to those submissions, based on their areas of expertise. Once the volunteers have reviewed the papers, journals can then use those assessments to decide whether to publish the research, de Vrieze says. To prevent bias, researchers are not allowed to review papers written by their colleagues at the same institution.

Science's de Vrieze notes that "the current peer review system … is hotly debated."

Many scientists complain that the system is slow, inefficient, of variable quality, and prone to favoritism. Moreover, there's growing resentment in some quarters about being asked to take valuable time to provide free reviews to journals that are operated by for-profit publishers or that don't make their papers open-access. Several suggestions have been made to improve the peer review system, such as introducing credits for reviewers, using social media, and making the process more transparent.

Peerage of Science, he adds, "aims to combine these ideas."


Sounds the same as the

Sounds the same as the present system with consderably greater potential for personal bias since a person's prejudice one way or the other might frequently be the motivation for themto offer to review a particular paper.

There is already plenty of

There is already plenty of such bias, very well-documented. It seems like a very interesting experiment.