Connection Between Epigenome, Selective Mutability, Evolution, and Human Disease
Li, Harris et al., PLoS Genetics
Researchers at the Baylor College of Medicine and elsewhere propose a "connection between the epigenome, selective mutability, evolution, and human disease" based on the findings of their study on associations of structural mutability with germline DNA methylation and with non-allelic homologous recombination mediated by low-copy repeats. "Combined evidence from four human sperm methylome maps, human genome evolution, structural polymorphisms in the human population, and previous genomic and disease studies consistently points to a strong association of germline hypomethylation and genomic instability," the Baylor-led team writes.
Science for All
New Scientist's Michael Brooks recently spoke with Princess Sumaya bint El Hassan of Jordan — who is also president of that country's Royal Scientific Society — about how science is perceived and how it should be used to "serve all the world's people." In the Arab world, the princess says, there isn't a clear understanding that science can improve lives. That may be because research priorities are geared towards the needs of a few, and not global issues. "When you think of the money spent on obesity-related research in comparison with the money spent on researching energy, water, environment and food, I'm not sure we have prioritized our research properly," she says. "The link between science and society is very important — you can't just be researching for research's sake. If there isn't an impact on people, what is the point?" The princess also tells Brooks that Jordan is developing a mentoring program for young scientists to start "nurturing a new generation of scientists in emerging nations."
Actually, research for
Actually, research for research's sake is a wonderful thing and the principal engine of discovery. I hope someone will educate this lovely and well-motivated woman accordingly.
@ nbishopric - I agree with
@ nbishopric - I agree with your first statement, but not if the basic needs of people aren't met first....
Science should meet the needs
Science should meet the needs of those who pay for it. Taxpayer funds are not distributed for scientific self-gratification, even though it sometimes seen that way in advanced societies. If we don't serve the public, the money will dry up!